In the continuing “mainstreaming” of the importance of corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, let us focus on “G” as we start the new year. Hong Kong is one of the earliest jurisdictions to have introduced ESG reporting of listed companies, and the requirements have undergone several rounds of updates since the first iteration in 2013. Under the revised ESG Reporting Guide issued in July 2020, a key enhancement is the focus on board governance and oversight of ESG issues. The enhanced ESG disclosure framework requires mandatory reporting on the board’s engagement and oversight on ESG matters and “comply or explain” disclosure on four environmental aspects and eight social aspects; and in relation to each aspect to cover (a) general disclosures on the issuer’s policies and/or compliance with laws and regulations (as applicable), and (b) key performance indicators (KPIs).
On 25 November 2022, Hong Kong Stock Exchange published its “2022 Analysis of ESG Practice Disclosure” (2022 Analysis), which observed significant improvement in disclosures on board oversight and management of ESG issues, from a review of 400 sample ESG reports published for the financial year ended 30 June 2021, 31 December 2021 and 31 March 2022. However, issuers are reminded of the requirement to also disclose how the board monitors the progress of ESG-related goals and targets set, and that failure to comply with this requirement would constitute a breach of the Listing Rules.
Issuers are recommended to disclose information on the relevant processes, controls and procedures used to monitor and manage ESG matters, which may involve elaboration on:
On specific environmental or social aspects, the 2022 Analysis emphasises climate disclosures, TCFD1-aligned climate reporting and adoption of TCFD recommendations, whereas issuers are recommended to enhance disclosures on supply chain risk management and green procurement practices.
As background, under the enhanced ESG Reporting Guide, all listed issuers are required to include in the annual ESG report a mandatory statement on the board’s oversight of ESG issues, the board’s ESG management approach and strategy, including the process to evaluate, prioritise and manage material ESG issues, and how the board reviews progress made against ESG-related goals and targets and how these relate to the issuer’s businesses. The ESG Report must also disclose how the company addresses materiality in ESG factors, and describe any stakeholder engagement and the significant stakeholders identified, and the process and results of the issuer’s stakeholder engagement.
As a matter of corporate governance and according to the Listing Rules2, the board of directors is collectively responsible for the management and operations of the company. This would include the responsibility to address ESG issues and to discharge disclosure obligations of the company. A company’s internal governance mechanism to supervise management of ESG issues may vary and there is no standard practice. However, under the ESG Reporting Guide, a listed company is required to disclose the company’s ESG governance structure to allow investors and stakeholders to assess the company’s commitment to and effort in ESG matters and the quality of its ESG governance.
Further, as elaborated in the “Leadership Role and Accountability in ESG – Guide for Board and Directors” published by HKEX in March 2020, the board of directors of a company should take leadership over and accountability in:
Pursuant to the most recent corporate governance review and the updated Corporate Governance Code published in December 2021 (CG Update), the linkage between corporate governance and ESG and the responsibility of the board for effective governance and oversight of ESG matters were emphasised, with the stated intention to drive effective corporate governance practices and ESG measures beyond a box-ticking exercise. With effect from financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022, listed companies are required to publish ESG reports at the same time as the publication of the annual reports.
Another key CG Update relevant to ESG governance is the new mandatory disclosure and annual review of the issuer’s shareholders’ communication policy and stakeholder engagement. This should cover the channels for shareholders to communicate their views on matters affecting the issuer, steps taken to solicit and understand the views of shareholders and stakeholders, and a statement of the issuer’s review of the implementation and effectiveness of the shareholders’ communication policy conducted within the year (including how it arrives at the conclusion). The intention is to introduce effective two-way communication for companies to actively solicit feedback from shareholders, and engage with shareholders and other stakeholders (including employees, customers, suppliers and investors) to achieve long-term success. There is also an upgrade to Code Provision requiring issuers to establish a whistleblowing policy and system for stakeholders (employees, customers, suppliers) to raise concerns in confidence and anonymity with the audit committee of the issuer (or any designated committee comprising a majority of the independent non-executive directors) about possible improprieties in any matter related to the issuer.
In the emphasis on the link between corporate governance and ESG, the CG Update stipulates that:
Remarkably, the CG Update introduced a new requirement on the board to align the company’s culture with its purpose, values and strategy, as a new Code Provision on corporate strategy, business model and culture, to instil and continually reinforce across the organisation values of acting lawfully, ethically and responsibly. Culture is explained as intertwined with the purpose the company seeks to achieve and the strategy to deliver long-term success, and when aligned with strategy and leadership, drive shared purpose and long-term sustainability.
Board directors of listed companies are therefore expected to establish and take into account corporate purpose, values, strategy and culture as part of corporate governance and oversight on ESG risks and opportunities. In this regard, while addressing climate-related risks are policy priorities and considered urgent, this should be regarded as one part of an issuer’s overall corporate governance and management of ESG issues, along with other environmental or social aspects that are material to the issuer’s businesses. On risk management and internal control, the CG Update also highlights that the board is responsible for evaluating risks in achieving the issuer’s strategic objectives and ensuring appropriate and effective risk management and internal control systems, and such risks include material ESG risks, as well as annual review of the issuer’s ESG performance and reporting.
With such clear expectation on board responsibility on ESG issues, directors of listed companies should be mindful of the discharge of directors’ duties in this regard.
Under the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) which has codified the statutory duty of care of directors, a director must exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence, which is defined to mean the care, skill and diligence that would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person with: (a) the general knowledge, skill and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the functions carried out by the director in relation to the company; and (b) the general knowledge, skill and experience that the director has.
The Hong Kong Companies Registry (CR) has published “A Guide on Directors’ Duties” which outlines the general principles of directors’ duties based on case law and statute. All directors of Hong Kong companies are advised to read the Guide, which is made accessible from the CR, the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEx), the Securities & Futures Commission (SFC), the Official Receiver’s Office and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). Among the principles covered in the said Guide, “Principle 1” states the duty to act in good faith for the benefit of the company as a whole, and “Principle 2” refers to the duty to use powers for a proper purpose for the benefit of members as a whole. These are elaborated to require a director of a company to act in good faith in the best interests of the company, meaning that a director owes a duty to act in the interests of all its shareholders, present and future. Further, in carrying out this duty, a director must (as far as practicable) have regard to the need to achieve outcomes that are fair as between its members, and that the primary and substantial purpose of the exercise of a director’s powers must be for the benefit of the company.
As noted above, for listed companies the updated Corporate Governance Code emphasises the responsibility of the board for effective governance and oversight of ESG matters, and further states that the entire board should focus on creating long-term sustainable growth for shareholders and delivering long-term values to all stakeholders, and that an effective corporate governance structure is to allow issuers to have a better understanding of, evaluate and manage risks and opportunities including environmental and social risks and opportunities.
Other than listed companies, the Companies Ordinance mandates all registered companies in Hong Kong (unless exempted) to prepare an annual directors’ report which, among other requirements, “must contain particulars of any other matter that is material for the members’ appreciation of the state of the company’s affairs and the disclosure of which will not, in the directors’ opinion, be harmful to the business of the company”. The directors’ report should contain a business review section which includes a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the company, particulars of important events affecting the company that have occurred in the financial year and an indication of likely future development in the company’s business. Further, the business review must include, to the extent necessary for an understanding of the development, performance or position of the company’s business:
While companies that meet certain specified criteria may qualify for simplified reporting and be exempted from the said requirement for business review (for example, private companies of a revenue or asset levels below certain thresholds), the requirements are generally applicable to public companies. In any case, such requirements of the Companies Ordinance provide a solid reference for directors of Hong Kong companies in considering appropriate management approach to take into account business risks including environmental and social factors in corporate business activities. For smaller companies, it is perhaps never too early to establish solid governance structure as foundation for growth and organisational purpose, values and strategy.
heading